πŸ“Œ

Complete guide: Pirls

Updated: October 24, 2026
PIRLS 2021 Reading Achievement

How the U.S. Fourth-Grade Cohort Compared Internationally in PIRLS 2021

The United States reported an average PIRLS 2021 reading score of 548. The U.S. fourth-grade cohort was tested after the summer at the beginning of fifth grade, rather than at the end of fourth grade, so comparisons with countries tested on the original schedule require care.

57 participating countries U.S. reported mean: 548 PIRLS scale centerpoint: 500 Assessment cycle: 2021

U.S. PIRLS 2021 Reading Statistics

The raw mean-score order and the NCES statistical comparison answer different questions because assessment mode and testing schedules differed across education systems.

U.S. Mean Score
548
48 points above the PIRLS scale centerpoint.
Raw Mean-Score Order
11th of 57
Descriptive ordering of reported country averages, not a statistical rank.
Advanced Benchmark
18%
Students reaching at least the 625-point benchmark.
High Benchmark
52%
Students reaching at least the 550-point benchmark.

Highest Reported PIRLS 2021 Country Averages

The chart shows the 20 highest reported country means from the complete 57-country table. The United States appears at 548.

Top 20 Country Mean Scores

PIRLS overall reading scale, 0–1,000

Country averages are ordered numerically. Fourteen countries, including the United States, delayed testing until the fourth-grade cohort had entered fifth grade.

Raw Order and Statistical Comparison Are Not the Same
  • Ten countries reported numerical averages above the U.S. mean of 548 in the all-country IEA table.
  • NCES restricted its U.S. paper-score comparison to 32 other education systems with comparable paper results; only three had averages statistically above the United States in that comparison.
  • The delayed U.S. assessment means the 2021 score should not be treated as a directly comparable fifth trend point beside earlier U.S. fourth-grade results.

PIRLS 2021 Reading Scores for All 57 Participating Countries

Countries are initially ordered by reported mean reading score. β€œGap vs U.S.” is the arithmetic difference from the U.S. mean of 548 and is not a statistical test.

OrderCountryMeanSEGap vs U.S.TimingIEA Note
1Singapore5873.1+39End of Grade 4Coverage note 3
2Ireland5772.5+29Delayed to beginning of Grade 5β€”
3Hong Kong SAR5732.7+25End of Grade 4Coverage note 2; sampling note †
4Russian Federation5673.6+19End of Grade 4β€”
5Northern Ireland5662.5+18Delayed to beginning of Grade 5Coverage note 2; sampling note †
6England5582.5+10One year later, end of Grade 4β€”
7Croatia5572.5+9Delayed to beginning of Grade 5Sampling note †
8Lithuania5522.3+4Delayed to beginning of Grade 5β€”
9Finland5492.4+1End of Grade 4β€”
10Poland5492.2+1End of Grade 4β€”
11United States5486.80Delayed to beginning of Grade 5Coverage note 2; participation note ≑
12Chinese Taipei5442.2-4End of Grade 4β€”
13Sweden5442.1-4End of Grade 4Coverage note 2
14Australia5402.2-8One year later, end of Grade 4β€”
15Bulgaria5403.0-8End of Grade 4β€”
16Czech Republic5402.3-8End of Grade 4β€”
17Hungary5393.4-9Delayed to beginning of Grade 5β€”
18Denmark5392.2-9End of Grade 4Coverage note 2; sampling note †
19Norway (5)5392.0-9End of school yearβ€”
20Italy5372.2-11End of Grade 4Coverage note 2
21Macao SAR5361.3-12End of Grade 4β€”
22Austria5302.2-18End of Grade 4β€”
23Slovak Republic5292.7-19End of Grade 4Sampling note †
24Latvia5282.6-20Delayed to beginning of Grade 5β€”
25Netherlands5272.5-21End of Grade 4Participation note ≑
26Germany5242.1-24End of Grade 4β€”
27New Zealand5212.3-27End of Grade 4Sampling note †
28Spain5212.2-27End of Grade 4β€”
29Portugal5202.3-28End of Grade 4Coverage note 2
30Slovenia5201.9-28End of Grade 4β€”
31Malta5152.7-33End of Grade 4β€”
32France5142.5-34End of Grade 4β€”
33Serbia5142.8-34End of Grade 4Coverage note 3
34Albania5133.1-35End of Grade 4Coverage note 2; reduced comparability noted by IEA
35Cyprus5112.9-37End of Grade 4β€”
36Belgium (Flemish)5112.3-37End of Grade 4β€”
37Israel5102.2-38One year later, end of Grade 4Coverage note 3
38Kazakhstan5042.7-44Delayed to beginning of Grade 5β€”
39TΓΌrkiye4963.4-52End of Grade 4Coverage note 2
40Belgium (French)4942.7-54End of Grade 4Coverage note 2
41Georgia4942.6-54Delayed to beginning of Grade 5Coverage note 1
42Montenegro4871.6-61End of Grade 4Coverage note 3
43Qatar4853.7-63Delayed to beginning of Grade 5β€”
44United Arab Emirates4831.8-65Delayed to beginning of Grade 5β€”
45Bahrain4582.9-90Delayed to beginning of Grade 5β€”
46Saudi Arabia4493.6-99Delayed to beginning of Grade 5Coverage note 3
47North Macedonia4425.3-106End of Grade 4β€”
48Azerbaijan4403.6-108End of Grade 4β€”
49Uzbekistan4372.9-111End of Grade 4β€”
50Oman4293.7-119End of Grade 4β€”
51Kosovo4213.1-127End of Grade 4Coverage note 2
52Brazil4195.3-129One year later, end of Grade 4Coverage note 2; sampling note †
53Iran, Islamic Rep. of4134.9-135One year later, end of Grade 4β€”
54Jordan3815.4-167End of Grade 4β€”
55Egypt3785.4-170End of Grade 4Coverage note 2; reliability reservation Ξ¨
56Morocco3724.5-176Delayed to beginning of Grade 5β€”
57South Africa2884.4-260One year later, end of Grade 4Reliability reservation Π–

NCES Comparison Using Paper-Assessment Results

NCES used the U.S. paper-bridge score and compared it with the 32 other education systems reporting paper results. This is the more appropriate source for interpreting whether observed score differences from the United States were statistically distinguishable.

Statistically Above U.S.
3
Ireland, Hong Kong SAR, and Northern Ireland.
Not Measurably Different
5
England, Poland, Australia, Bulgaria, and Macao SAR.
Statistically Below U.S.
24
The remaining education systems in the NCES paper-result comparison.
Why the U.S. Can Be 11th in Raw Score Order but Only Three Systems Are Statistically Higher
  • A numerical ordering treats every one-point difference as a position change, even when sampling uncertainty makes two averages statistically indistinguishable.
  • The IEA all-country table also combines different assessment schedules and modes, while NCES narrowed its U.S. comparison to paper-based results.
  • The U.S. estimate has a standard error of 6.8 in the IEA table, wider than the standard errors reported for many countries near the U.S. mean.

U.S. Performance at the PIRLS International Benchmarks

PIRLS reports the share of students reaching four cumulative score thresholds. The comparison below uses the international median reported in the PIRLS 2021 results.

U.S. Benchmark Attainment vs International Median

Percentage of students reaching each benchmark or higher

The U.S. percentage exceeded the international median at all four PIRLS thresholds, with the widest percentage-point gap at the High benchmark.

BenchmarkCut ScoreU.S.Intl. MedianGap
Advanced62518%7%+11 pp
High55052%36%+16 pp
Intermediate47581%75%+6 pp
Low40095%94%+1 pp

PIRLS 2021 Benchmarking Participants

IEA reported eight subnational or separate benchmarking participants in addition to the 57 participating countries. These entities are not included in the 57-country raw score order.

OrderBenchmark ParticipantMeanSEGap vs U.S.TimingIEA Note
1Moscow City, Russian Federation5982.1+50End of Grade 4β€”
2Dubai, UAE5521.5+4Delayed to beginning of Grade 5Coverage note 2
3Quebec, Canada5512.7+3Delayed to beginning of Grade 5Participation note ≑
4Alberta, Canada5393.6-9End of Grade 4Coverage note 3; participation note ≑
5British Columbia, Canada5353.5-13End of Grade 4Coverage note 2
6Newfoundland & Labrador, Canada5233.2-25End of Grade 4Coverage note 2
7Abu Dhabi, UAE4403.5-108Delayed to beginning of Grade 5β€”
8South Africa (6)3844.5-164One year later, Grade 6β€”

What the U.S. International Comparison Shows

The reported mean, statistical comparison, benchmark profile, and testing schedule should be read together rather than reduced to a single rank.

U.S. Performance Was Above the Scale Centerpoint

The U.S. mean of 548 was 48 points above the PIRLS scale centerpoint of 500, which has remained fixed since the scale was established in 2001.

Near-Neighbour Scores Were Closely Packed

Finland and Poland reported 549, the United States 548, and Chinese Taipei and Sweden 544. Raw score ordering therefore creates several position changes within a narrow score range.

Higher Benchmarks Showed the Larger U.S. Advantage

The U.S. exceeded the international median by 16 percentage points at the High benchmark and 11 points at Advanced, compared with a one-point difference at Low.

2021 Is an Unusual U.S. Trend Year

The United States tested the intended fourth-grade cohort in fall 2021 after the students had entered fifth grade. Earlier U.S. PIRLS cycles assessed fourth-graders, limiting direct trend interpretation.

Data Sources and Measurement

Primary international source

International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement, PIRLS 2021 International Results in Reading, especially Exhibit 1.3 for country means and Exhibit 4.2 for international benchmarks.

IEA PIRLS 2021 International Results

U.S. comparison source

National Center for Education Statistics, PIRLS 2021 U.S. Highlights. NCES reports the U.S. paper-bridge score and the comparison with education systems reporting paper results.

NCES PIRLS 2021 U.S. Results

Technical reference

NCES PIRLS 2021 Methodology and Technical Notes, including assessment mode, delayed testing, participation, coverage, international benchmarks, and U.S. bridge-study information.

NCES PIRLS 2021 Technical Notes

Latest cycle used

PIRLS 2021. International results were released in 2023.

Unit

Average PIRLS reading scale score. The achievement scale ranges from 0 to 1,000 and has a fixed centerpoint of 500.

Coverage

57 participating countries plus eight benchmarking participants. Benchmarking participants are shown separately and are not included in the 57-country raw mean-score order.

U.S. assessment timing: PIRLS was scheduled for U.S. fourth-graders in spring 2021. Pandemic disruption delayed U.S. data collection until fall 2021, when the intended fourth-grade cohort had entered fifth grade. The United States was one of 14 countries with this delayed schedule.

U.S. assessment mode: The United States administered digital PIRLS and a paper bridge assessment. The United States chose to report the paper-bridge achievement score because of concerns about linking the digital and paper achievement results.

Score ordering: The β€œOrder” column is a descriptive sort of published country means. It should not be read as a formal statistical ranking. Small numerical differences can fall within sampling uncertainty.

Standard errors: SE values are published standard errors from the IEA country table. Reported means are rounded; arithmetic gaps on this page therefore use the displayed rounded values.

IEA annotations: Coverage notes 1–3 and the † and ≑ marks identify population-coverage or sampling-participation conditions defined by IEA. Ξ¨ identifies a reliability reservation where more than 15 percent but no more than 25 percent of students had achievement too low for estimation. Π– identifies the stronger reliability reservation where that percentage exceeded 25 percent. IEA also reported reduced comparability for Albania.

Trend limitation: Earlier U.S. PIRLS scoresβ€”542 in 2001, 540 in 2006, 556 in 2011, and 549 in 2016β€”were based on fourth-graders. NCES cautions against directly comparing those results with the 2021 U.S. score of 548 because the 2021 U.S. cohort was tested in fifth grade after the delay.